Generatieve AI
in de juridische praktijk
Dr. Wim De Mulder (KU Leuven)
Webinar op donderdag 25 februari 2027
Cryptomunten en de fiscaliteit
Mr. Dave van Moppes (Tuerlinckx Advocaten)
Webinar op donderdag 28 januari 2027
Bestuurdersaansprakelijkheid
bij cyberincidenten
Dhr. Bernd Fiten en dhr. Bram Goetry (CRANIUM)
Webinar op vrijdag 29 januari 2027
Wenst u meerdere opleidingen
te volgen bij LegalLearning?
Overweeg dan zeker onze voordeelformules!
Krijg toegang tot +250 opleidingen
Live & on demand webinars
Can authorities block an entire website without distinguishing between legal and illegal content? European Court of Human Rights 23 June 2020 (Artes Law)
Author: Catherine Van de Heyning (Artes Law)
Publication date: 30/06/2020
According to the European Court of Human Rights such an extreme measure will only be allowed if it is (among others) “prescribed by law”.
This means that the measures should not only have a legal basis in domestic law, but should also enable individuals to regulate their conduct and protect them against arbitrary interference and possible excessive effects.
This requires adequate safeguards that can put boundaries on unlimited discretion of authorities. Examples are notifications to website owners, impact and proportionality assessments, access to blocking decisions and effective remedies to challenge the orders.
Forbidding indiscriminate blocking measures that arbitrarily interfere with the rights of website owners and users, is something that is also known under copyright law where the Court of Justice has already held that measures aimed at blocking illegal content (i.e. copyrighted material put online without permission), should be strictly targeted at the infringing works and not affect internet users who are lawfully using ISPs services to access information (UPC Telekabel).
» Bekijk alle artikels: IT & IP













