Vereffening-verdeling van nalatenschappen:
16 probleemstellingen
Mr. Nathalie Labeeuw (Cazimir)
Webinar op vrijdag 26 april 2024
Zekerheden: een update
aan de hand van wetgeving en rechtspraak
Mr. Ivan Peeters en mr. Philip Van Steenwinkel (Hogan Lovells)
Webinar op vrijdag 8 november 2024
De invoering van Boek 6
en de impact voor de medische sector
Prof. dr. Christophe Lemmens (Dewallens & Partners)
Webinar op vrijdag 4 oktober 2024
Ondernemingsstrafrecht:
wat wijzigt er door boek I en boek II van het Strafwetboek?
Mr. Stijn De Meulenaer (Everest)
Webinar op dinsdag 11 juni 2024
Het nieuwe Boek 6:
de impact op de werkvloer
Mr. Chris Persyn (Cautius)
Webinar op donderdag 4 juli 2024
Het nieuwe Boek 6 en de impact inzake verzekeringen:
een analyse aan de hand van 10 knelpunten
Mr. Sandra Lodewijckx en mr. Pieter-Jan Van Mierlo (Lydian)
Webinar op vrijdag 26 april 2024
Will remote damages be excluded in future Belgian contract law? (LegalNews.be)
Author: LegalNews.be
Date of publication: 27/08/2018
Opinion by Olivier Vanden Berghe (Partner Contracts & Litigation at Liedekerke Wolters Waelbroeck Kirkpatrick).
Under present contract law any damage should be compensated, as soon as it is caused by a breach (= if there had been no damage without breach).
The Civil Code says that only foreseeable damage should be compensated, but this is a virtual restriction, meaning (as will be specified in the new Code) that the occurrence of the damage should be foreseeable, not its extent: once a breach is established and some harm is foreseeable, the defendant is liable for the full extent of the harm, irrespective of its indirectness or remoteness.
According to the future chapter on torts (not yet approved in Council of Ministers though) there is no liability if the link between the breach and the damage “is so remote that it would be manifestly unreasonable to hold the defendant liable” taking into account the “unforeseeable nature of the damage” and the actual impact of the breach.
Since this new article will also apply to contractual liability, it might introduce remoteness in contract law.
But should we really add such a restriction to liability? Belgian case law is not overly liberal when granting damages and the prohibition of abuse of rights should suffice as a safeguard if needed.
» Bekijk alle artikels: Verbintenissen & Goederen, Verzekeringen & Aansprakelijkheid